CHILD WELFARE
CENTRAL REGISTRY STATISTICS

Each year the Division produces summary statistics from the CPS Central Registry regarding child abuse and neglect in North Carolina. To understand the incidence of child maltreatment the data is presented with unduplicated counts.

In August 2002 North Carolina began implementing the Multiple Response System . This reform created a change in the way we captured some of our data. As such, Child Protective Services Summary Statistics are available only since SFY 2002.

In February 2006, the Division added a new finding for Family Assessments, "Services Provided, No longer Needed." This finding indicates that the safety of a child and future risk of harm are no longer issues because the agency has been successful in frontloading neccessary services during the family assessment.

For SFY 2007 and later please refer to the UNC County Experiences Report website, which includes 'Point-In-Time' data for Child Protective Services.

Child Abuse Statistics Summary 2002-2006
Unduplicated Counts of Children Subject of a Child Protective Services Assessment
All Child Protective Services Assessments	Children Substantiated or Found in Need of Services
1996-1997	1996-1997
1997-1998	1997-1998
1998-1999	1998-1999
1999-2000	1999-2000
2000-2001	2000-2001
2001-2002	2001-2002
2002-2003	2002-2003
2003-2004	2003-2004
2004-2005	2004-2005
2005-2006	2005-2006

Table 1 - County Departments of Social Services
County Name	County Number	Level	County Name	County Number	Level
Alamance	01	Level II	Johnston	51	Level II
Alexander	02	Level I	Jones	52	Level I
Alleghany	03	Level I	Lee	53	Level I
Anson	04	Level I	Lenoir	54	Level I
Ashe	05	Level I	Lincoln	55	Level I
Avery	06	Level I	Macon	56	Level I
Beaufort	07	Level I	Madison	57	Level I
Bertie	08	Level I	Martin	58	Level I
Bladen	09	Level I	McDowell	59	Level I
Brunswick	10	Level II	Mecklenburg	60	Level III
Buncombe	11	Level III	Mitchell	61	Level I
Burke	12	Level II	Montgomery	62	Level I
Cabarrus	13	Level II	Moore	63	Level II
Caldwell	14	Level II	Nash	64	Level II
Camden	15	Level I	New Hanover	65	Level III
Carteret	16	Level II	Northampton	66	Level I
Caswell	17	Level I	Onslow	67	Level II
Catawba	18	Level III	Orange	68	Level II
Chatham	19	Level I	Pamlico	69	Level I
Cherokee	20	Level I	Pasquotank	70	Level I
Chowan	21	Level I	Pender	71	Level I
Clay	22	Level I	Perquimans	72	Level I
Cleveland	23	Level II	Person	73	Level I
Columbus	24	Level II	Pitt	74	Level II
Craven	25	Level II	Polk	75	Level I
Cumberland	26	Level III	Randolph	76	Level II
Currituck	27	Level I	Richmond	77	Level I
Dare	28	Level I	Robeson	78	Level III
Davidson	29	Level II	Rockingham	79	Level II
Davie	30	Level I	Rowan	80	Level II
Duplin	31	Level II	Rutherford	81	Level II
Durham	32	Level III	Sampson	82	Level II
Edgecombe	33	Level II	Scotland	83	Level I
Forsyth	34	Level III	Stanly	84	Level I
Franklin	35	Level II	Stokes	85	Level I
Gaston	36	Level III	Surry	86	Level II
Gates	37	Level I	Swain	87	Level I
Graham	38	Level I	Transylvania	88	Level I
Granville	39	Level I	Tyrrell	89	Level I
Greene	40	Level I	Union	90	Level II
Guilford	41	Level III	Vance	91	Level II
Halifax	42	Level II	Wake	92	Level III
Harnett	43	Level II	Warren	93	Level I
Haywood	44	Level II	Washington	94	Level I
Henderson	45	Level II	Watauga	95	Level I
Hertford	46	Level I	Wayne	96	Level II
Hoke	47	Level I	Wilkes	97	Level II
Hyde	48	Level I	Wilson	98	Level II
Iredell	49	Level II	Yadkin	99	Level I
Jackson	50	Level I	Yancey	100	Level I

Table 2 - Race codes used in the reports
H/L	Hispanic/Latino
NH/L	Not Hispanic/Latino
W	White
B	Black
I	American Indian or Alaskan Native
A	Asian
H	Native Hawaian or other Pacific Islander
U	Unable to Determine

Download Microsoft Excel Viewer

Page Modified 07/10/2009

Questions about our services or website? Email us | Disclaimer

CHILD WELFARE CENTRAL REGISTRY STATISTICS

CHILD WELFARE
CENTRAL REGISTRY STATISTICS